The false tsar "Peter the First Romanov" - he is Anatoly. Double of Peter I: "The most terrible secret of Russian history" Why Peter 1 was called a substitute

According to various opinion polls, Peter I remains one of the most popular historical figures in our time. He is still glorified by sculptors, poets compose odes to him, politicians speak enthusiastically about him.

But did the real person Pyotr Alekseevich Romanov correspond to the image that, through the efforts of writers and filmmakers, was introduced into our consciousness?

Frame from the film "Peter the Great" based on the novel by A. N. Tolstoy ("Lenfilm", 1937 - 1938, directed by Vladimir Petrov,
in the role of Peter - Nikolai Simonov, in the role of Menshikov - Mikhail Zharov):

This post is quite lengthy. , consisting of several parts, is dedicated to exposing the myths about the pen of the Russian emperor, which still roam from book to book, from textbook to textbook, and from film to film.

Let's start with the fact that the majority represents Peter I absolutely not the way he really was.

According to the films, Peter is a huge man with a heroic physique and the same health.
In fact, with a height of 2 meters 4 centimeters (really huge in those days, and very impressive in our times), he was incredibly thin, with narrow shoulders and torso, a disproportionately small head and leg size (about 37 sizes, and this despite such and such height!), with long arms and spider-like fingers. In general, an absurd, awkward, clumsy figure, a freak of a freak.

The clothes of Peter I, which have survived to this day in museums, are so small that there can be no talk of any heroic physique. In addition, Peter suffered from nervous attacks, probably of an epileptic nature, he was constantly ill, he never parted with a first-aid kit with a lot of medicines that he took daily.

Do not trust the court portrait painters and sculptors of Peter.
For example, a well-known researcher of the Petrine era, historian E. F. Shmurlo (1853 - 1934) describes his impression of the famous bust of Peter I by B. F. Rastrelli:

"Full of spiritual power, unyielding will, an imperious gaze, intense thought make this bust related to Michelangelo's Moses. This is a truly formidable king, capable of causing awe, but at the same time majestic, noble."

Otdako more accurately conveys the appearance of Peter plaster mask taken from his face in 1718 father of the great architect B. K. Rastrelli when the king was investigating the betrayal of Tsarevich Alexei.

This is how the artist describes it A. N. Benois (1870 - 1960):“Peter’s face became at that time gloomy, directly terrifying with its menacingness. One can imagine what impression this terrible head, placed on a giant body, must have produced, while still shifting eyes and terrible convulsions that turned this face into a monstrously fantastic image.

Of course, the real appearance of Peter I was completely different from what appears before us on his formal portraits.
For example, these:

Portrait of Peter I (1698) by a German artist
Gottfried Kneller (1648 - 1723)

Portrait of Peter I with the signs of the Order of St. Andrew the First-Called (1717)
works by the French painter Jean-Marc Nattier (1685 - 1766)

Please note that between the writing of this portrait and the manufacture of the lifetime mask of Peter
Rastrelli has only been a year. What, are they similar?

The most popular at present and highly romanticized
according to the time of creation (1838) portrait of Peter I
works by French artist Paul Delaroche (1797 - 1856)

Trying to be objective, I cannot fail to note that monument to Peter I , works of the sculptor Mikhail Shemyakin , made by him in the USA and installed in the Peter and Paul Fortress in 1991 , also does not correspond much to the real image of the first Russian emperor, although, quite possibly, the sculptor sought to embody the same "monstrously fantastic image" about which Benoit spoke.

Yes, Peter's face was made from his death wax mask (cast by B. K. Rastrelli). But Mikhail Shemyakin at the same time consciously, achieving a certain effect, increased the proportions of the body by almost one and a half times. Therefore, the monument turned out to be grotesque and ambiguous (some people admire it, while others hate it).

However, the very figure of Peter I is also very ambiguous, about which I want to tell everyone who is interested in Russian history.

At the end of this part another myth about death of Peter I .

Peter did not die because he caught a cold, saving a boat with drowning people during a flood in St. Petersburg in November 1724 (although there really was such a case, and it led to an exacerbation of the tsar's chronic illnesses); and not from syphilis (although from his youth, Peter was extremely promiscuous in his relationships with women and had a whole bunch of venereal diseases); and not from the fact that he was poisoned by some "specially donated sweets" - all these are widespread myths.
The official version, announced after the death of the emperor, according to which pneumonia was the cause of his death, does not hold water.

In reality, Peter I had a neglected inflammation of the urethra (he had suffered from this disease since 1715, according to some sources, even since 1711). The disease worsened in August 1724. The attending physicians, the Englishman Gorn and the Italian Lazzaretti, unsuccessfully tried to cope with it. From January 17, 1725, Peter did not get out of bed, on January 23 he lost consciousness, into which he never returned until his death on January 28.

"Peter on his deathbed"
(artist N. N. Nikitin, 1725)

The doctors performed the operation, but it was too late, 15 hours after it, Peter I died without regaining consciousness and without leaving a will.

So, all the stories about how in last moment the dying emperor tried to draw his last will on the will, but managed to write only "Leave everything..." , are also nothing more than a myth, or if you want a legend.

In the next short part so as not to make you sad, I will bring historical anecdote about Peter I , which, however, also refers to the myths about this ambiguous personality.

Thank you for attention.
Sergei Vorobyov.

The last tsar of all Russia and the first Emperor of Russia - Peter the First- a truly great figure. No wonder this king was called Peter the Great. He sought not only to expand the borders of the Russian state, but also to make life in it similar to what he saw in Europe. He learned a lot himself and taught others.

Brief biography of Peter the Great

Peter the Great belonged to the Romanov family, he was born June 9, 1672. His father is a king Alexey Mikhailovich. His mother is the second wife of Alexei Mikhailovich, Natalia Naryshkina. Peter I was the first child from the tsar's second marriage and the fourteenth in a row.

AT 1976 the father of Peter Alekseevich died and his elder son ascended the throne - Fedor Alekseevich. He was sickly and ruled for about 6 years.

The death of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich and the accession of his eldest son Fyodor (from Tsarina Maria Ilyinichna, nee Miloslavskaya) pushed Tsarina Natalya Kirillovna and her relatives, the Naryshkins, into the background.

Streltsy rebellion

After the death of Fedor III, the question arose: who will rule next? Peter's older brother Ivan was a sickly child (he was also called weak-minded) and it was decided to put Peter on the throne.

However, the relatives of the first wife of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich did not like it - Miloslavsky. Enlisting the support of 20 thousand archers, who showed discontent at that time, the Miloslavsky staged a riot in 1682.

The consequence of this streltsy rebellion was the proclamation of Peter's sister, Sophia, as regent until Ivan and Peter grow up. Subsequently, Peter and Ivan were considered dual rulers of the Russian state until Ivan's death in 1686.

Tsarina Natalya was forced to go to the village of Preobrazhenskoye near Moscow with Peter.

"Amusing" troops of Peter

In the villages Preobrazhensky and Semenovsky Peter was engaged in far from children's games - he formed from his peers "fun" troops and learned to fight. Foreign officers helped him to master military literacy.

Later, from these two battalions were formed Semenovsky and Preobrazhensky regiments- the basis of Peter's guard.

Beginning of independent government

In 1689 On the advice of his mother, Peter married. The daughter of a Moscow boyar was chosen for him as a bride Evdokia Lopukhin. After the marriage, 17-year-old Peter was considered an adult and could claim independent rule.

Suppression of the rebellion

Princess Sophia immediately realized what danger she was in. Not wanting to lose power, she persuaded the archers stand up to Peter. Young Peter managed to gather an army loyal to him, and together with him he moved to Moscow.

The uprising was brutally suppressed, the instigators were executed, they were hanged, flogged with a whip, burned with a red-hot iron. Sofia was sent to Novodevichy Convent.

Capture of Azov

Since 1696, after the death of Tsar Ivan V, Peter became sole ruler of Russia. He turned his gaze a year earlier to the map. Advisers, among them the beloved Swiss Lefort, suggested that Russia needed access to the sea, it was necessary to build a fleet, it was necessary to move south.

The Azov campaigns began. Peter himself participated in the battles, gained combat experience. On the second attempt, they captured Azov, in a convenient bay of the Sea of ​​\u200b\u200bAzov, Peter laid the city Taganrog.

Trip to Europe

Peter went "incognito", he was called the volunteer Petr Mikhailov,
sometimes captain of the Preobrazhensky Regiment.

In England Peter the Great studied maritime affairs, in Germany- artillery, in Holland worked as a simple carpenter. But he had to return to Moscow prematurely - he received information about a new rebellion of archers. After the brutal massacre of the archers and executions, Peter began to prepare for the war with Sweden.

Peter's war with Sweden

On the allies of Russia - Poland and Denmark- the young Swedish king began to attack CharlesXII who decided to conquer all of northern Europe. Peter I decided to go to war against Sweden.

Battle of Narva

First battle near Narva in 1700 was unsuccessful for the Russian troops. Having a multiple advantage over the Swedish army, the Russians failed to take the fortress of Narva, and they had to retreat.

decisive action

Having attacked Poland, Charles XII got bogged down in the war for a long time. Taking advantage of the respite, Peter announced a set of recruits. He issued a decree according to which they began to collect money for the war against Sweden, bells from churches melted down into cannons, strengthened old fortresses, erected new ones.

St. Petersburg - the new capital of Russia

Peter the First personally participated in a sortie with two regiments of soldiers against the Swedish ships that blocked the exit to the Baltic Sea. The attack was successful, the ships were captured, the exit to the sea became free.

On the banks of the Neva, Peter ordered the construction of a fortress in honor of Saints Peter and Paul, later named Petropavlovskaya. It was around this fortress that the city was formed. St. Petersburg is the new capital of Russia.

Battle of Poltava

The news of Peter's successful sortie on the Neva forced the Swedish king to move his troops to Russia. He chose the south, where he was waiting for help from Turk and where is ukrainian Hetman Mazepa promised him to give the Cossacks.

The battle near Poltava, where the Swedes and Russians pulled their troops, did not last long.

The Cossacks brought by Mazepa were left by Charles XII in the wagon train, they were not sufficiently trained and equipped. The Turks never came. Numerical superiority in the troops was on the side of the Russians. And no matter how hard the Swedes tried to break through the ranks of the Russian troops, no matter how they rebuilt their regiments, they failed to turn the tide of the battle in their favor.

The cannonball hit Karl's stretcher, he lost consciousness, and panic began among the Swedes. After the victorious battle, Peter arranged a feast at which treated the captured Swedish generals and thanked them for the science.

Internal reforms of Peter the Great

Peter the Great actively, in addition to wars with other states, was engaged in reforms within the country. He demanded that the courtiers take off their coats and put on European clothes, that they shave their beards, go to balls arranged for them.

Important reforms of Peter

Instead of the Boyar Duma, he established Senate, who dealt with the solution of important state issues, introduced a special Table of ranks, which defined the classes of military and civilian officials.

Petersburg began to operate Marine Academy, opened in Moscow math school. Under him, the country began to publish first Russian newspaper. For Peter, there were no titles and awards. If he saw a capable person, albeit of low birth, then he sent him to study abroad.

Reform Opponents

Many innovations of Peter did not like- starting from the highest ranks, ending with serfs. The church called him a heretic, the schismatics - the Antichrist, sent all sorts of blasphemy against him.

The peasants were completely dependent on the landowners and the state. Increasing tax burden 1.5-2 times, for many it turned out to be unbearable. Major uprisings took place in Astrakhan, on the Don, in Ukraine, the Volga region.

Breaking the old way of life caused a negative reaction among the nobles. Peter's son, his heir Alexei, became an opponent of reforms and went against his father. He was accused of conspiracy and in 1718 sentenced to death.

Last year of reign

In the last years of the reign of Peter was very sick He had kidney problems. In the summer of 1724, his illness intensified, in September he felt better, but after a while the attacks intensified.

On January 28, 1725, he had such a bad time that he ordered a camp church to be built in the room next to his bedroom, and on February 2 he confessed. Forces began to leave the sick, he no longer screamed, as before, from severe pain, but only moaned.

On February 7, all those sentenced to death or hard labor were amnestied (excluding murderers and those convicted of repeated robbery). On the same day, at the end of the second hour, Peter demanded paper, began to write, but the pen fell out of his hands, only two words could be made out of what was written: "Give it all...".

At the beginning of the sixth hour in the morning February 8, 1725 Peter the Great "The Great" died in terrible agony in his Winter Palace near the Winter Canal, according to the official version, from pneumonia. He was buried in Cathedral of the Peter and Paul Fortress in St. Petersburg.

studying historical facts and events that were carefully hushed up and kept secret, it can be unequivocally said that PETER 1 on the throne was replaced by an impostor.

The substitution of the real Peter 1 and his capture took place during his trip to Amsterdam along with the Great Embassy. I tried, by copying, to put together in this post various sources confirming this tragic fact in the history of Russia.

The embassy is leaving a young man of twenty-six years old, above average height, solid build, physically healthy, with a mole on his left cheek, with wavy hair, well-educated, loving everything Russian, an Orthodox (it would be more correct - orthodox) Christian, who knows the Bible by heart and etc. etc.

Two years later, a man returns who practically does not speak Russian, who hates everything Russian, who until the end of his life never learned to write in Russian, having forgotten everything he could before leaving for the Grand Embassy and miraculously acquired new skills and abilities, without a mole on on the left cheek, with straight hair, a sickly, forty-year-old looking man.

Isn't it true, some unexpected changes happened to the young man during his two years of absence.

Curiously, the papers of the Great Embassy do not mention that Mikhailov (under this surname young Peter went with the embassy) fell ill with a fever, but it was no secret for the embassy who, in fact, “Mikhailov” was.

A man returns from a trip with a chronic fever, with traces of long-term use of mercury preparations, which were then used to treat tropical fever.

For reference, it should be noted that the Grand Embassy went by the northern sea route, while tropical fever can be “earned” in southern waters, and even then, only after visiting the jungle.

In addition, after returning from the Great Embassy, ​​Peter 1, during naval battles, demonstrated extensive experience in boarding combat, which has specific features that can only be mastered by experience. Which requires personal participation in many boarding battles.

All this together suggests that the person who returned with the Great Embassy was an experienced sailor who participated in many naval battles and sailed a lot in the southern seas.

Before the trip, Peter 1 did not take part in naval battles, if only because during his childhood and youth, Muscovy or Moscow Tartaria did not have access to the seas, with the exception of the White Sea, which simply cannot be called tropical. Yes, and on this Peter 1 was not often, and even then, as an honorary passenger.

During his visit to the Solovetsky Monastery, the boat on which he was miraculously saved during a storm, and he personally makes a memorial cross for the Archangel Cathedral, on the occasion of salvation in a storm.

And if we add to this the fact that he often corresponded with his beloved wife (Tsarina Evdokia), whom he missed, when he was away, upon his return from the Great Embassy, ​​without even seeing her, without explaining the reasons, he sends him to a convent .

The Russian embassy that accompanied the tsar consisted of 20 people, and was headed by A.D. Menshikov. After returning to Russia, this embassy consisted of only the Dutch (including the notorious Lefort), only Menshikov remained the only one from the old composition.

This "embassy" brought a completely different tsar, who spoke Russian poorly, did not recognize his friends and relatives, which immediately betrayed a substitution: This forced Tsarina Sophia, the sister of the real Tsar Peter I, to raise archers against the impostor. As you know, the Streltsy rebellion was brutally suppressed, Sophia was hanged on the Spassky Gates of the Kremlin, the impostor exiled the wife of Peter 1 to a monastery, where she never reached, and called his own from Holland.

“His” brother Ivan V and “his” little children Alexander, Natalya and Lavrenty False Peter immediately killed, although the official story tells us about this in a completely different way. And he executed the youngest son Alexei as soon as he tried to free his real father from the Bastille.

=======================

Peter the impostor did such transformations with Russia that we are still echoing around. He began to act like an ordinary conqueror:

- defeated the Russian self-government - "zemstvo" and replaced it with the bureaucratic apparatus of foreigners who brought theft, debauchery and drunkenness to Russia and vigorously planted it here;

- transferred the peasants to the property of the nobles, which turned them into slaves (to whiten the image of the impostor, this "event" falls on Ivan IV);

- defeated the merchants and began to plant industrialists, which led to the destruction of the former universality of people;

- defeated the clergy - the bearers of Russian culture and destroyed Orthodoxy, bringing it closer to Catholicism, which inevitably gave rise to atheism;

- introduced smoking, drinking alcohol and coffee;

- destroyed the ancient Russian calendar, rejuvenating our civilization by 5503 years;

- ordered all Russian chronicles to be brought to St. Petersburg, and then, like Filaret, he ordered them to be burned. He called on the German "professors"; write a completely different Russian history;

- under the guise of a struggle with the old faith, he destroyed all the elders who lived for more than three hundred years;

- he forbade the cultivation of amaranth and the use of amaranth bread, which was the main food of the Russian people, which destroyed longevity on Earth, which then remained in Russia;

- canceled natural measures: a fathom, a finger, an elbow, an inch, which were present in clothes, utensils and architecture, making them fixed in the Western manner. This led to the destruction of ancient Russian architecture and art, to the disappearance of the beauty of everyday life. As a result, people ceased to be beautiful, since divine and vital proportions disappeared in their structure;

- replaced the Russian title system with the European one, which turned the peasants into an estate. Although the "peasant" is a title, higher than the king, about which there is more than one evidence;

- destroyed the Russian script, which consisted of 151 characters, and introduced 43 characters of the script of Cyril and Methodius;

- disarmed the Russian army, exterminating the archers as a caste with their miraculous abilities and magical weapons, and introduced primitive firearms and stabbing weapons in a European manner, dressing the army first in French and then in German uniforms, although the Russian military uniform was itself a weapon. Among the people, the new regiments were called "amusing".

But his main crime is the destruction of Russian education (image + sculpture), the essence of which was to create in a person three subtle bodies that he does not receive from birth, and if they are not formed, then the consciousness will not have a connection with the consciousnesses of past lives. If in Russian educational institutions a generalist was made from a person who could, starting from bast shoes and ending with a spaceship, do everything himself, then Peter introduced a specialization that made him dependent on others.

Before Peter the Pretender, people in Russia did not know what wine was, he ordered barrels of wine to be rolled out onto the square and the townspeople to drink for free. This was done to rip off the memory past life. During the period of Peter, the persecution of babies who were born, remembering their past lives and able to speak, continued. Their persecution began with John IV. The mass destruction of infants with past life memories cast a curse on all incarnations of such children. It is no coincidence that today, when a talking child is born, he lives no more than two hours.

After all these deeds, the invaders themselves did not dare to call Peter the Great for a long time. And only in the 19th century, when the horrors of Peter the Great had already been forgotten, did a version arose about Peter the innovator, who did so much useful for Russia, even brought potatoes and tomatoes from Europe, allegedly brought there from America. Solanaceae (potatoes, tomatoes) were widely represented in Europe even before Peter. Their endemic and very ancient presence on this continent is confirmed by a large species diversity, which took more than one thousand years. On the contrary, it is known that it was during the time of Peter that a campaign was launched against witchcraft, in other words, food culture (today the word "witchcraft" is used in a sharply negative sense). Before Peter there were 108 types of nuts, 108 types of vegetables, 108 types of fruits, 108 types of berries, 108 types of root nodules, 108 types of cereals, 108 spices and 108 types of fruits *, corresponding to 108 - Russian gods.

After Peter, there were units of sacred species used for food, which a person can see for himself. In Europe, this was done even earlier. Cereals, fruits and nodules were especially destroyed, since they were associated with the reincarnation of a person. The only thing that Peter the impostor did was allowed to cultivate potatoes (Orthodox Old Believers do not use them for food), sweet potato and earthen pear, which today are poorly eaten. The destruction of sacred plants consumed at a certain time led to the loss of complex divine reactions of the body (remember the Russian proverb “every vegetable has its own time”). Moreover, the mixing of food caused putrefactive processes in the body, and now people exude stench instead of fragrance. Adoptogenic plants have almost disappeared, only weakly active ones remain: the “root of life”, lemongrass, zamaniha, golden root. They contributed to the adaptation of a person to difficult conditions and kept a person young and healthy. There are absolutely no plants-metamorphizers left that contribute to various metamorphoses of the body and appearance, for 20 years it was found in the mountains of Tibet "The Sacred Coil", and even that has disappeared today.

* Today, the word “fruit” is understood as a unifying concept, which includes fruits, nuts, berries, which used to be called simply gifts, while gifts of herbs and shrubs were called fruits. An example of fruits are peas, beans (pods), peppers, i.e. peculiar unsweetened fruits of herbs.

The campaign to impoverish our diet continues and at present, Kalega and sorghum have almost disappeared from consumption, it is forbidden to grow poppies. From many sacred gifts, only the names remain, which are given to us today as synonyms for famous fruits. For example: pruhva, kaliva, bukhma, landushka, which are passed off as rutabaga, or armud, kvit, pigwa, gutey, gun - disappeared gifts that are passed off as quince. Kukish and dulya in the 19th century denoted a pear, although these were completely different gifts, today these words are used to call the image of a fig (also, by the way, a gift). A fist with an inserted thumb, used to denote the mudra of the heart, today it is used as a negative sign. Dulya, figs and figs were no longer grown, because they were sacred plants among the Khazars and Varangians. Already recently, proska has been called “millet”, barley - barley, and millet and barley cereals have disappeared forever from the mankind of agriculture.

What happened to the real Peter I? He was captured by the Jesuits and placed in a Swedish fortress. He managed to convey the letter to Charles XII, King of Sweden, and he rescued him from captivity. Together they organized a campaign against the impostor, but the entire Jesuit-Masonic fraternity of Europe, called to fight, together with the Russian troops (whose relatives were taken hostage in case the troops decide to go over to the side of Charles), won at Poltava. The real Russian Tsar Peter I was again captured and placed away from Russia - in the Bastille, where he later died. An iron mask was put on his face, which caused a lot of talk in France and Europe. The Swedish king Charles XII fled to Turkey, from where he tried again to organize a campaign against the impostor.

It would seem, kill the real Peter, and there would be no trouble. But the fact of the matter is, the invaders of the Earth needed a conflict, and without a living king behind bars, neither the Russian-Swedish war nor the Russian-Turkish war would have succeeded, which in fact were civil wars, which led to the formation of two new states: Turkey and Sweden, and then several more. But the real intrigue was not only in the creation of new states. In the 18th century, all of Russia knew and talked about the fact that Peter I was not a real tsar, but an impostor. And against this background, the “great Russian historians” who arrived from the German lands: Miller, Bayer, Schlozer and Kuhn, who completely distorted the history of Russia, no longer presented any difficulty in declaring all the Dmitriev tsars as False Dmitrys and impostors who did not have the right to the throne, and who did not managed to groan, they changed the royal surname to - Rurik.

The genius of Satanism is Roman law, which is the basis of the constitutions of modern states. It was created contrary to all ancient canons and ideas about a society based on self-government (autocracy).

For the first time, judicial power was transferred from the hands of the priests to the hands of people who did not have a spiritual dignity, i.e. the power of the best has been replaced by the power of anyone

Roman law is presented to us as the “crown” of human achievement, in reality it is the pinnacle of disorder and irresponsibility. State laws under Roman law are based on prohibitions and punishments, i.e. on negative emotions, which, as you know, can only destroy. This leads to a general lack of interest in the implementation of laws and to opposition of officials to the people. Even in the circus, work with animals is based not only on a whip, but also on a carrot, but a person on our planet is rated lower than animals by conquerors.

In contrast to Roman law, the Russian state was built not on prohibitive laws, but on the conscience of citizens, which strikes a balance between encouragement and prohibition. Let us recall how the Byzantine historian Procopius of Caesarea wrote about the Slavs: "They had all the laws in their heads." Relations in ancient society were regulated by the principles of horse, from where the words “canon” (ancient - konon), “from time immemorial”, “chambers” (i.e. according to horse) have come down to us. Guided by the principles of the horse, a person avoided mistakes and could incarnate again in this life. The principle is always above the law, because it contains more possibilities than the law, just as a sentence contains more information than one word. The very word "law" means "beyond the horse." If a society lives according to the principles of the horse, and not according to the laws, it is more vital. Commandments contain more than a horse, and therefore surpass it, just as a story contains more than a sentence. The commandments can improve human organization and thinking, which in turn can improve the principles of the horse.

As the remarkable Russian thinker I.L. Solonevich, who knew from his own experience the charms of Western democracy, in addition to the long-lived Russian monarchy, based on popular representation (zemstvo), merchants and clergy (meaning pre-Petrine times), democracy and dictatorship were invented, replacing each other in 20-30 years. However, let us give him the floor himself: “Professor Whipper is not quite right when he writes that modern humanitarian sciences- this is only "theological scholasticism and nothing more"; it is something much worse: it is deceit. This is a whole collection of deceptive travel signals, beckoning us to the mass graves of famine and executions, typhus and wars, internal ruin and external destruction.

The “science” of Diderot, Rousseau, D’Alembert and others has already completed its cycle: there was famine, there was terror, there were wars, and there was the external defeat of France in 1814, in 1871, in 1940. The science of Hegel, Mommsen, Nietzsche and Rosenberg also ended its cycle: there was terror, there were wars, there was famine and there was defeat in 1918 and 1945. The science of the Chernyshevskys, Lavrovs, Mikhailovskys, Milyukovs and Lenins has not yet gone through the whole cycle: there is hunger, there is terror, there were wars, both internal and external, but the defeat will still come: inevitable and inevitable, one more payment for the verbiage of two hundred years, for swamp lights lit by our masters of thoughts over the most rotten places of a real historical swamp.

Not always the philosophers listed by Solonevich themselves came up with ideas that could destroy society: they were often prompted to them.

V.A. Shemshuk "Return of Paradise to Earth"
======================

“With other European peoples, you can achieve the goal in philanthropic ways, but not so with the Russians ... I am not dealing with people, but with animals that I want to turn into people” - such a documented phrase of Peter 1 very clearly conveys his attitude towards the Russian people.

It is hard to believe that these same "animals", in gratitude for this, called him the Great.
Russophobes will immediately try to explain everything by the fact that, yes, he made people out of animals, and only because of this Russia became Great and the “animals” that became people gratefully called him the Great.
Or maybe this is the gratitude of the owners of the Romanovs for the perfectly fulfilled obligations to destroy precisely the traces of the greatness of the Russian People, which haunted those who wanted to create a Great History for themselves, the ruling circles of states, until recently the former provincial outlying provinces?
And it was this very Greatness of the Russian People that did not allow them to create it?

======================================== ======

One can talk a lot and interestingly about Peter I. For example, today it is already known that his short but intense rule actually cost the Russian people more than 20 million lives (read the article by N.V. Levashov “Visible and invisible genocide” about this). Maybe that's why the man who is called today Peter I is now declared "great"?

Anyone interested in this topic can also watch the video:

In fact, the impostor of the false Peter I is the Roman protege Isaac Andre.
He is buried in St. Isaac's Cathedral, named after him. The story of Peter
I was invented by the Latin rulers of the true Slavic history

VKontakte Facebook Odnoklassniki

One of the reasons that led to the emergence of the version about the substitution of Tsar Peter I was the research of A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky

The beginning of these studies were the findings made during the study of an exact copy of the throne of Ivan the Terrible. In those days, the zodiac signs of the current rulers were placed on the thrones. Thanks to the study of the signs placed on the throne of Ivan the Terrible, scientists have found that the actual date of his birth differs from the official version by four years.

Scientists compiled a table of the names of Russian tsars and their birthdays, and thanks to this table, it was revealed that the official birthday of Peter I does not coincide with the day of his angel, which is a blatant contradiction compared to all the names of Russian tsars. After all, names in Russia at baptism were given exclusively according to the calendar, and the name given to Peter breaks the established centuries-old tradition, which in itself does not fit into the framework and laws of that time.

Photo by Stan Shebs from wikimedia.org

A. Fomenko and G. Nosovsky, on the basis of the table, found out that the real name, which falls on the official date of birth of Peter I, is Isakiy. This explains the name of the main cathedral of tsarist Russia. So, in the dictionary of Brockhaus and Efron it says: “St. Isaac's Cathedral is the main temple in St. Petersburg, dedicated to the name of St. Isaac of Dalmatia, whose memory is honored on May 30, the birthday of Peter the Great.

Image from lib.rus.ec

Let's consider the following obvious historical facts. Their totality shows a fairly clear picture of the substitution of the real Peter I for a foreigner:

1. An Orthodox ruler was leaving Russia for Europe, wearing traditional Russian clothes. Two surviving portraits of the king of that time depict Peter I in a traditional caftan. The tsar wore a caftan even during his stay at the shipyards, which confirms his adherence to traditional Russian customs. After the end of his stay in Europe, a man returned to Russia wearing exclusively European-style clothes, and in the future, the new Peter I never put on Russian clothes, including an attribute obligatory for the tsar - royal vestments. This fact is difficult to explain with the official version of a sudden change in lifestyle and the beginning of adherence to the European canons of development.

2. There are quite weighty grounds for doubting the difference in the structure of the body of Peter I and the impostor. According to accurate data, the growth of the impostor Peter I was 204 cm, while the real king was shorter and denser. It should be noted that the height of his father, Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov, was 170 cm, and his grandfather, Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov, was also of average height. The difference in height of 34 cm is very much out of the general picture of true kinship, especially since in those days people over two meters tall were considered an extremely rare occurrence. Indeed, even in the middle of the 19th century, the average height of Europeans was 167 cm, and the average height of Russian recruits at the beginning of the 18th century was 165 cm, which fits into the general anthropometric picture of that time. The difference in height between the real king and the false Peter also explains the refusal to wear royal clothes: they simply did not fit the size of the newly appeared impostor.

3. The portrait of Peter I by Godfried Kneller, which was created during the Tsar's stay in Europe, clearly shows a distinct mole. In later portraits, the mole is absent. It is difficult to explain this by the inaccurate works of portrait painters of that time: after all, the portraiture of those years was distinguished by the highest level of realism.

4. Returning after a long trip to Europe, the newly-minted tsar did not know about the location of the richest library of Ivan the Terrible, although the secret of finding the library was passed from tsar to tsar. So, Princess Sophia knew where the library was and visited it, and the new Peter repeatedly made attempts to find the library and did not even disdain excavations: after all, the library of Ivan the Terrible kept the rarest publications that could shed light on many secrets of history.

5. An interesting fact is the composition of the Russian embassy that went to Europe. The number of those accompanying the king was 20 people, while the embassy was headed by A. Menshikov. And the returned embassy consisted, with the exception of Menshikov, only of the subjects of Holland. Moreover, the duration of the trip has increased many times over. The embassy, ​​together with the king, went to Europe for two weeks, and returned only after two years of stay.

6. Returning from Europe, the new king did not meet either with relatives or with his inner circle. And then in a short time different ways got rid of his next of kin.

7. Sagittarius - the guards and the elite of the tsarist army - suspected something was wrong and did not recognize the impostor. The streltsy rebellion that had begun was brutally suppressed by Peter. But the archers were the most advanced and combat-ready military formations that faithfully served the Russian tsars. Sagittarius became by inheritance, which indicates the highest level of these units.

Image from swordmaster.org

It is characteristic that the scale of the destruction of archers was more global than according to official sources. At that time, the number of archers reached 20,000 people, and after the pacification of the streltsy rebellion, the Russian army was left without infantry, after which a new set of recruits was made and the army was completely reorganized. A noteworthy fact is that in honor of the suppression of the Streltsy rebellion, a commemorative medal was issued with inscriptions in Latin, which had never been used before when minting coins and medals in Russia.

Image from oboudnoda.org

8. Imprisonment of the lawful wife of Evdokia Lopukhina in a monastery, which the tsar did in absentia, while in the Great Embassy in London. Moreover, after the death of Peter, Lopukhina, by order of Catherine I, was transferred to the Shlisselburg fortress, which was famous for its harsh conditions of detention. Subsequently, Peter will marry Martha Samuilovna Skavronskaya-Kruse, who comes from the lower classes, who after his death will become Empress Catherine I.

Image from wikimedia.org

Now let's consider what the greatest steps were made by the newly-minted tsar for Russia.

All official versions claim that Peter I was the greatest reformer who laid the foundations for the formation of a powerful Russian Empire. In fact, the main activity of the impostor was to destroy the foundations of the former statehood and the spirituality of the people. Among the most famous great "deeds" of Peter there are both well-known and little-known facts that testify to the true appearance and reforms of the new king.

- Introduction of the Russian form of slavery- serfdom, which completely restricts the rights of peasants both in the old and in the conquered lands. In one form or another, the consolidation of peasants has existed since the 15th century, but Peter I carried out a tough reform in relation to the peasants, completely depriving them of their rights. A remarkable fact is the fact that neither in the Russian North nor in Siberia serfdom was widespread.

- Carrying out tax reform with the introduction of the most severe tax system. In parallel, the replacement of small silver money for copper began to be carried out. Having created the Ingrian Chancellery, headed by Menshikov, Peter introduced ruinous taxes, which included taxes on private fishing, wearing a beard, baths. Moreover, adherents of the old rites were subject to a double tax, which served as an additional incentive for the resettlement of the Old Believers in the most remote places in Siberia.

- Introduction in Russia of a new system of chronology, which put an end to the countdown "from the creation of the world." This innovation had a strong negative impact and became an additional incentive for the gradual eradication of the original Old Believer faith.

- Transfer of the capital from Moscow to the built St. Petersburg. The mention of Moscow as an ancient sacred place is found in many sources, including Daniil Andreev in his work "Rose of the World". The change of the capital also served to weaken spirituality and reduce the role of the merchants in Russia.

The destruction of ancient Russian chronicles and the beginning of rewriting the history of Russia with the help of German professors. This activity has acquired a truly gigantic scale, which explains the minimum number of surviving historical documents.

- Rejection of Russian writing, which consisted of 151 characters, and the introduction of the new alphabet of Cyril and Methodius, which consisted of 43 characters. With this, Peter dealt a severe blow to the traditions of the people and cut off access to ancient written sources.

- Cancellation of Russian measures of measurement, such as sazhen, elbow, vershok, which subsequently caused the strongest changes in traditional Russian architecture and art.

- Reducing the influence of the merchants and the development of the industrial class, who was given gigantic powers, up to creating their own pocket armies.

- The most brutal military expansion into Siberia, which became the forerunner of the final destruction of the Great Tartaria. In parallel, a new religion was planted on the conquered lands, and the lands were heavily taxed. The peak of the looting of Siberian burials, the destruction of holy places and local clergy also falls on the time of Peter. It was during the reign of Peter the Great that numerous detachments of bugrovers appeared in Western Siberia, who, in search of gold and silver, opened up old burial places and plundered holy and sacred places. Many of the most valuable "finds" made up the famous collection of Scythian gold of Peter I.

- Destruction of the system of Russian self-government- zemstvos and the transition to a bureaucratic system, which, as a rule, was headed by hirelings from Western Europe.

- The most severe repressions against the Russian clergy, the actual destruction of Orthodoxy. The scale of repression against the clergy was global. One of the most significant punishers of Peter was his close associate Yakov Bruce, who became famous for punitive expeditions to Old Believer sketes and the destruction of old church books and property.

- The widespread distribution of narcotic drugs in Russia that cause rapid and persistent addiction - alcohol, coffee and tobacco.

- A complete ban on the cultivation of amaranth from which both butter and bread were made. This plant contributes not only to improving human health, but also prolongs life by 20-30%.

- The introduction of the system of provinces and the strengthening of the punitive role of the army. Often the right to collect taxes was given directly into the hands of the generals. And each province was obliged to maintain separate military units.

- The actual ruin of the population. So, A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky indicate that according to the 1678 census, 791,000 households were subject to taxation. And the general census conducted in 1710 showed only 637,000 households, and this despite the fact that a large number of lands subordinated to Russia during this period. Characteristically, but this only affected the strengthening of tax taxes. So, in the provinces, where the number of households decreased, taxes were levied according to the data of the old census, which led to the actual plunder and destruction of the population.

- Peter I also distinguished himself by his atrocities in Ukraine. So, in 1708, the hetman's capital, the city of Baturyn, was completely plundered and destroyed. More than 14,000 people out of the city's 20,000 population were killed in the massacre. At the same time, Baturin was almost completely destroyed and burned, and 40 churches and monasteries were looted and desecrated.

Contrary to popular belief, Peter I was by no means a great military leader: de facto, he did not win a single significant war. The only "successful" campaign can only be considered the Northern War, which was rather sluggish and lasted for 21 years. This war caused irreparable damage to the financial system of Russia and led to the actual impoverishment of the population.

One way or another, all the atrocities of Peter, called in official versions history of "reformist activity", were aimed at the complete eradication of both the culture and faith of the Russian people, and the culture and religion of the peoples living in the annexed territories. In fact, the newly-minted tsar caused irreparable damage to Russia, completely changing its culture, way of life and customs.

The hypothesis that the Russian Tsar Peter I was replaced by Freemasons during his Great Embassy - a trip to Western Europe in 1697-1698, despite its lack of evidence, is by no means unfounded in connection with the many "oddities" that the person who returned to Russia under the guise of a tsar. As a rule, supporters of this version, based on a study of Peter's biography, provide 10 evidence of his substitution. And here is the evidence:

1) So, it turned out that out of the entire embassy, ​​consisting of 20 nobles and 35 commoners, only one Menshikov returned with "Peter". And all the other members of the "Great Embassy", who knew the king well by sight and could confirm his authenticity, died under unclear circumstances, about which "Peter" refused to talk to anyone, including representatives of the clergy until his death. Probably, all these people died under torture, but did not betray their real king, people and fatherland.

2) The second proof is related to the strong changes in the appearance of the king, which occurred in just 1 year with a little of his absence. So Comparative characteristics portraits of Tsar Peter before his departure for Europe and the person who arrived back under his name, revealed a number of external inconsistencies. So, he left the country as a man who looked 25 years old, had a round face and a wart under his left eye, taller than average and of a dense build. The man who returned back was as much as 2 meters 4 centimeters tall, very thin and with a completely different face shape. At the same time, he looked to be at least 40 years old. And what's most interesting foreigners living in Russia openly called him "our tsar".

3) Peter's close relatives also noticed the substitution of the tsar. We are told a historical myth that his sister allegedly wanted to seize the throne, and therefore declared him an "imposter". But the sister and could not help noticing the substitution. And she is not alone, and therefore she was supported by the archers, who knew the king personally. But the rebellion was suppressed with the help of foreign mercenaries, and Princess Sophia was exiled to a monastery. But if the falsifiers of history accused the king's sister of wanting to seize the throne, then they failed to come up with a "convenient" version with Peter's wife. After all, Evdokia Lopukhina was almost the only person whom the real Peter trusted as himself and sincerely loved. Their connection was so strong that during his trip to Europe, Peter sent her letters almost every day until a certain moment, until the substitution took place. And the man who arrived under the guise of Peter did not meet with his beloved wife before and sent her to the monastery, even despite the persuasion of the priests, whose will he had previously listened to.

4) The man who arrived under the guise of Peter had a very suspiciously bad memory for his former acquaintances. He could not remember the faces of many of his relatives. he was constantly confused in names and did not remember a single detail from his "past life" before the trip to Europe. At the same time, not only Peter's relatives and friends suspected a substitution. His former associates Lefort and Gordon, as well as some other high-ranking persons who stubbornly sought communication with the king, were killed under strange circumstances immediately after the arrival of the impostor. And one more very interesting detail - the new "Peter" absolutely did not remember where the library of Ivan the Terrible was located, although its coordinates were transmitted strictly from tsar to tsar by inheritance.

It is likely that this library, where authentic historical sources about our and world history were stored, was almost the main goal of those forces that carried out the substitution of the tsar and they hoped that the impostor would be able to find traces of it in Russia. Why was this library so important to them, and why is it still so? Yes, because it is able to literally "blow up" all the false and falsified "official history" that the Vatican and its servants have been inventing for centuries. It is asked. And what about Masons? Doesn't the city on the Neva "built" by "Peter" have many Masonic symbols? So the connection between the Freemasons and the false Peter is quite obvious and reveals to us who the person who played the role of the Russian Tsar really was.

And the question is what does the Vatican have to do with it, which seems to be fighting against the Masons? Yes, that's just the point, that "sort of like". In fact, both the Vatican and the Freemasons serve the same masters, and all their "enmity" is purely external, aimed at deceiving ordinary people, just like the "official history" concocted together. But if the Vatican "supervises" the religions of the "Biblical project", then the Freemasons "supervise" official science. This is how total control is carried out so that humanity does not gain access to "forbidden knowledge". So, it is in the Vatican library, which has many underground multi-kilometer levels, that many artifacts and authentic historical documents of past civilizations, as well as ancient knowledge about the structure of our world, are kept secret from ordinary people.

And if you think that access to these artifacts is possible for mere mortals, then you are very much mistaken. That is why it was so important for the Vatican and the Freemasons to gain access to the library of Ivan the Terrible. And without it, the new "tsar" was content only with the mass seizure and destruction of ancient Russian books from monasteries, although this also caused considerable damage to our culture. But back to the evidence of the substitution of the real Peter.

5) There is one very strange "coincidence": immediately after the departure of "Peter" from Europe, a new prisoner in an iron mask appears in the walls of the Bastille, whose name was known only to King Louis XIV. The appearance and completeness of this prisoner ideally suited the appearance of the real Tsar Peter. This prisoner died in 1703 and all traces of his presence were carefully destroyed.

6) It is known that the real Tsar Peter loved old Russian clothes and wore traditional Russian caftans even in the heat, being proud of his native culture and customs. But it turned out that the man who arrived in Russia under the guise of Peter immediately forbade sewing Russian clothes for himself and never once put on the traditional royal attire, despite the persuasion of the boyars and the clergy. This man wore only European clothes until his death, and as we know, such dramatic changes in a person, especially a Russian, simply could not happen.

7) False Peter's hatred for everything Russian was not limited to one piece of clothing. He suddenly hated everything that was connected with Russia and the Russian people. In addition, he showed a rather strange for the Russian tsar poor knowledge of the Russian language and claimed that he had “forgotten” Russian writing during the year of his stay in Europe. He also refused to observe Orthodox fasts, although before his trip he was distinguished by piety. He couldn't remember any of those. sciences, which he was taught as a representative of the Russian high nobility. But on the other hand, that person constantly shocked those around him with the manners of a commoner. And the reasons for such a strange "amnesia" are quite understandable, as is the praising of the "progressive tsar" by Russophobic forces. And only the hatred of the false Peter for the Russian people can explain the colossal decline in the Russian population that occurred during his reign.

8) The bouts of chronic tropical fever that regularly tormented the new "king" were also rather strange, which can be picked up only after a long stay in hot countries. But, as you know, the embassy of Tsar Peter traveled to Europe by the northern sea route, which excludes even a short stay in those countries where one could get such a disease.

9) The false Peter had another strange difference from the real king. If before the trip the tsar considered cavalry and foot troops to be the basis of military power and dreamed of land battles, then the impostor who arrived under his guise was a real "sea wolf" and repeatedly demonstrated during naval battles excellent knowledge tactics of naval combat and boarding attacks, which surprised his surroundings a lot. The main concept of this man was the development of the navy, and his experience as a talented naval commander could only be obtained after many naval battles.

10) The impostor did not like the son of Peter and Evdokia - Tsarevich Alexei and forced him to take tonsure, especially after the birth of his own son. Although the real Peter simply doted on his son. The prince guessed about the substitution of his father, and therefore fled to Poland, from where he wanted to get to the Bastille in order to rescue the real Peter. However, the supporters of the false Peter caught him and took him to the impostor. And this is precisely the real reason for the murder of Tsarevich Alexei by the false Peter, who was afraid of being exposed.

The official history paints a completely different "picture" for us, but if we take into account who exactly and by whose order this very "history" was written, then everything falls into place. Moreover, along with 10 proofs of Peter's substitution, there are some other oddities in his behavior. which, within the framework of the version of the substitution of the real king, look quite logically explainable by his belonging to catholic church. We have already noted that the false Peter was not distinguished by piety, did not observe the posts of the Russian Church, but besides this, he also actively promoted Catholicism in our country.

Here, for example, is what O. Lutsenberger writes about this: "Peter I repeatedly attended magnificent Catholic services in the German Quarter, and Catholics in his reign began to play a prominent role in Russian society. Peter I, on the one hand, declared Orthodoxy the state religion, and on the other hand, to eliminate the political role of Russian Orthodox Church liquidated the patriarchate, introducing the post of locum tenens of the patriarchal throne.

Stefan Yavorsky, a former Uniate who studied Latin theological science in Polish Jesuit colleges and was nicknamed "Pole" and "Latin", was appointed to the post of locum tenens. In 1721 the office of locum tenens of the patriarchal throne was abolished and the Holy Synod was created. The Synod was led by Feofan Prokopovich, who also received an excellent Catholic education.

It is not surprising that the Synod, created under the leadership of the false Peter, already in the first year of its existence, adopted a decree that allowed the marriages of Orthodox Christians with persons of other Christian confessions without changing their faith by the latter, which greatly facilitated the penetration of Catholicism in our country and created comfortable conditions for Western mercenaries ( not only the military), faithfully serving the new "king". Also, seminary-type theological schools were created in the country, where the language of instruction was Latin, and Holy Bible learned from the Vulgate. All this only strengthened the suspicion among the people about the substitution of the real tsar by the "German".

As you can see, the search for the library of Ivan the Terrible, about the location of which the real Tsar Peter knew, turned out to be unsuccessful for the impostor. However, he issued a Decree of December 20, 1720 on sending ancient manuscripts and printed books from monasteries and a Decree of February 16, 1722 on sending chronicles stored in monasteries for making copies from them. At the same time, all discovered authentic sources were either destroyed or transferred to the Vatican library. Instead, copies were made, in which appropriate changes were made, which were supposed to help the Vatican in the total falsification of history.

What conclusion can be drawn from all this? Considering what changes have occurred in the appearance, behavior, knowledge and interests of the king in just one year of his absence in the country, as well as the reaction of loved ones to all these changes, it can be argued with a fairly high degree of probability that instead of the real Peter, an impostor arrived back, whose owners were interested in the location of the library of Ivan the Terrible, as well as the establishment of control over state power in Russia.

Pious and loving his country and people, the real Tsar Peter, could not change so dramatically in just one year and hate everything Russian, up to the mass destruction of Russian people. All this was done by the false Peter, who, most likely, was related to the Masons. It was his efforts that brought up a new pro-Western corrupt "elite", who slavishly bowed to "civilized" Europe and scolded everything Russian. At the same time, judging by the depraved inclinations and rude disposition, this man did not have a high birth and, most likely, by occupation in his "pre-tsar" life he was either a naval officer or a pirate. The custom of taking queens of German or Prussian origin also went from him.